Formulating a strategy is about insight, direction, and the right solution. According to the greatest pioneers in strategy development research, there are three generic strategies for maintaining a competitive position in the market. The three aren’t mutually exclusive, but a serious strategic effort will prioritize one over the other two.
Initiating any change process requires that the people involved be dissatisfied with the status quo and have a strong, shared desire to reach another state. That desire must be outlined in such a way that everyone understands and wants to follow it through. This is what gives energy and the desire to change, and also overcomes barriers along the way. The relationship between the desired and current state are shown below:
It might seem obvious, but a simple definition of the strategy growth process is:
Many organizations don’t know where they are or where they’re going — but are still trying to agree on how to get there. It obviously won't work because, as Alice in Wonderland’s Cheshire Cat said, “If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.”
Therefore, a one-page mission statement should answer the following questions:
A good way to establish identity, mission and vision is to have team members write down points they think are important and create a matrix. Then consider the points in each segment and formulate one short, descriptive sentence that best captures the essence of the points. The same can be done with identification, formulation, and values; three or four core values for the whole group is ideal.
In general, the team dialogue should focus on what the team wants, what meets the team's expectations, and what meets the aspiration level.
One of the most important (and often most difficult) questions in this process revolves around the organization’s market/product scope. A clear statement of market/product scope can prevent team members from developing plans that won’t be accepted by top management because they aren’t within the defined scope of the strategy growth.
A path for growth toward a new market/product scope can be determined using the Ansoff Matrix:
Consolidating current business involves doing more of the same. It‘s about strengthening the core business of the company. It‘s usually combined with another alternative, but if the market is fast-growing and attractive, it could be the only focus chosen for the planning period.
A product development strategy is considered in light of the maturity of the current market and the company’s inherent core competencies. In a mature market, product development can be the best alternative, especially if there are competencies the company can leverage.
Market development: With competitive products and a good customer intimacy infrastructure, the organization might want to grow by entering new markets or reaching out to new target groups. Careful segmentation is key to this alternative—detecting the same or similar needs as current customers and markets.
Diversification is the riskiest alternative since it can involve the company entering a business in which it has no prior experience. It should only be considered if there are unique capabilities or core competencies that could be leveraged, preferably in a strategic partnership.
Kaplan and Norton defined three generic strategies important for sustaining a competitive position in the market. Note that these are not mutually exclusive, but the strategic thrust will give priority to one of the three:
After determining the growth strategy, designate performance parameters that will support the growth. The overall goal for the organization is at the top of the hierarchy. It is helpful to think of the parameters using the following hierarchy:
This model shows the natural hierarchy of strategic components: